Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

They didn’t figure for the break-even point; if Soc sec is taken at full retirement age, it takes a good number of years to recoup the money that would have been earned had the recipient taken soc sec at 62.


11 posted on 11/27/2018 11:08:04 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57

I did that calculation once.

I included the income that could be earned on money received starting at 62 at a modest 2.5%.

My break even age was 78 and some months.

A bird in hand, etc. Start taking benefits ASAP.


14 posted on 11/27/2018 11:13:34 AM PST by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57

Yes, I agree. I don’t think they want for us to think in terms of “break even”. My thinking is that, since SS stops cold when you die, it is beneficial to start taking benefits as early as is comfortable (based on one’s overall plans and other sources of retirement income). My theory is that I might as well use the SS money to live on, and preserve my savings and other assets to pass along to the kids. I think 65 is a good age, since most of us are stuck without health insurance until we can get Medicare, if quitting work before age 65.


23 posted on 11/27/2018 11:19:04 AM PST by NEMDF (D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: WildHighlander57

I started collecting at 62,my break even point was age 75——and here I am,at 86. (sigh)

.


24 posted on 11/27/2018 11:24:43 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson