What’s interesting about what Roberts said, for me at least, is the fact that:
- didn’t SCOTUS recently reaffirm that the Executive Branch has the authority to make the rules on immigration? And one of the reasons they did that was because of the 9th Circuit judge in Hawaii making up the rules as he saw fit?
- this ruling came from an obama appointed judge, from the 9th circuit, the most overturned court in the country
- for him to sit there and say they’re impartial, given the fact that not only does the 9th circuit make up the rules as they go along, so does the DC Circuit and the fact that SCOTUS, w/ Kennedy, pretty much made up a law concerning gay marriage.
So, his statement about impartiality is laughable. But, now, as we learn more and more about Bush #2 and that he was as much a globalist as hid dad and others, maybe his pick for Chief Justice wasn’t so great after all.
They could impeach Roberts. Would the Democrats allow it?