[9YearLurker]

Here’s a pretty interesting article by Joe diGenova, who of course has been one of Trump’s defenders and, briefly, attorneys, now “informal adviser” to him:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/justice-roberts-attack-against-president-trump-was-blatantly-political-and-wrong

He asks why did Roberts go political on Trump now? It seems to me the ones who have generally gone that way the most pointedly are the ones at the most legal jeopardy, should Trump get the truth out on them. We’ve understood Roberts to be compromised, with the threat against him being that he would lose his illegally adopted children otherwise, but is this a hint that deeper crimes against Roberts could be exposed — presenting the GOP’s beefed up Senate with an opportunity to get a replacement through in the next two years?

[rodguy911]

Score 200 pass go....

[Tigen]

I agree panic in DC

[Excuse_Me]

Here’s a pretty interesting article by Joe diGenova, who of course has been one of Trump’s defenders and, briefly, attorneys, now “informal adviser” to him.

That was an interesting article! Thanks for posting it. I had not heard that Chief Justice Roberts had said that to President Trump.