[JockoManning]

Thanks. I think that's a good summary of Dilley's commentary. I believe Trump is eager, itching to deal emphatically with the voter fraud and other treasonous DIMRAT crap. He still wants to do it in very legally kosher ways but also wants to speed things up considerably. Will be interesting to see what changes in his approach, if anything.

I don't think he's one to wait patiently to do the right thing if there IS a faster, better way.

He does, however, seem keenly aware of the supreme priority to achieve his goals in a way that leaves them lastingly secure for a good long time. He doesn't want a new arising Obummer or Shrillery to be able to sabotage them--and certainly not easily.

I think Dilley also articulated well the business of the very very limited available truly functional and effective options--i.e. TRUMP--PERIOD.

I think Trump cares a lot more how he's perceived than Dilley does. While I think Trump HAS to pay some attention to such issues--I think he and his goals could profit from more of Dilley's attitude and stance--i.e. ignorant, traitorous, stupid, childish, super impatient fit-throwing low information, low IQ folks can go jump off a cliff . . . or follow Dilley's exhortations.

[9YearLurker]

Ha ha. I actually think Trump has a fair dose of Dilley in him already. Not sure that more would work on a language sort of basis.

And interesting that you took a speeded up timeline out of his comments. My thinking was more in the line of being less likely to play nice and let the Dems off the hook in terms of legal jeopardy and public exposure. I got something of a message of “gloves off, but in due time”.