Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jyotishi

There are no coincidences with the Royals. Harry’s marriage takes him out of the running for the crown.


68 posted on 11/11/2018 1:39:22 PM PST by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chauncey Gardiner
There are no coincidences with the Royals. Harry’s marriage takes him out of the running for the crown.

He's still sixth in the line of succession, after William's three children. She attended Catholic school, but supposedly isn't Catholic, so on what do you base your claim?

1. Charles
2. William (Charles' first son)
3. George (William's first child)
4. Charlotte (William's second child)
5. Louis (William's third child)
6. Harry (Charles' second son)
7. Andrew (Charles' eldest brother)
8. Beatrice (Andrew's first child)
9. Eugenie (Andrew's second child)
10. Edward (Charles' next eldest brother)
11. James (Edward's first child)
12. Louise (Edward's second child)
13. Anne (Charles' sister; she is older than Andrew and Edward, but the rules re female heirs were only changed 4 or 5 years ago in case William had a female firstborn; Anne may not ascend as long as she has a brother living due to the former rule giving precedence to males)
14. Peter (Anne's first child)
15. Zara (Anne's second child)
And 43 others more distantly related, such as children of Princess Margaret, the deceased sister of the Queen, and then the Queen's cousins and their children

77 posted on 11/11/2018 6:46:28 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("The word 'racist' is used to describe 'every Republican that's winning'" --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson