[Mears]

A woman on You Tube making claims about something that happened 55 years ago is as believable the the claims made by the Kavanaugh accuser.

Too late to be taken seriously——anyone can say anything about anyone.

Frightening.

.

[JockoManning]

Except that others have affirmed her relationship with LBJ and generally, her knowledge of significant events. Time has an influence on memory, for sure. But not as much on some key elements of dramatic events as some might think. Certainly corroborating evidence is wise to consider. Given the wealth of corroborating evidence, I think her testimony largely stands.

Most biographies of Presidents etc. are written long after the facts concerned.

[stylin19a]

Somewhere down the road, someone will be saying the same things about Juanita Broadrick...been 40 years....

[defconw]

So based on that criteria, a WWII Veteran should not be taken seriously if he recalls his service? No one should ever write a memoir? Just stop teaching history altogether because happened to long ago to be taken seriously.

You can live like that. I prefer to read and watch and listen to anything I can get my hands on. I found her to be compelling. Not sure just based on that video in of itself, that she is credible. However there are others who have said similar things about a meeting the night before Kennedy was murdered.

Leads me to want to know more, not less.

[pgkdan]

A woman on You Tube making claims about something that happened 55 years ago is as believable the the claims made by the Kavanaugh accuser.

Except she's not the only one making these accusations. There have been a number of folks saying the same thing for decades.

[Iscool]

A woman on You Tube making claims about something that happened 55 years ago is as believable the the claims made by the Kavanaugh accuser.

But she's been making those claims for 55 years...