Well, I can’t speak to that. I will say that sundance at CTH has been around a long time and he covers a wide variety of subjects. In fact his statement today is the first time I have seen him reference Q.
He’s said for quite a while that Q isn’t real.
I can’t argue whether Sundance has directly mentioned Q or not, because I am not a regular reader. At times I have followed a link there, and sometimes thought well of the product.
But I think it is obvious that conservative for-profit bloggers (and I am all for them making a buck!) are feeling the competitive heat from Q ... who has millions of followers, many from the same potential pool of conservatives, and who charges nothing for “News” (whatever you think of it) that is always juicy and as timely as next week.
In other words, Q is dominating this particular marketplace (in harmony with POTUS tweets). All others have to find a niche around this reality.
I would add that Q is not going anywhere, and all is still wildly bullish for growth of the Q channel, though there may be some ups and downs.
“””Well, I can’t speak to that. I will say that sundance at CTH has been around a long time and he covers a wide variety of subjects. In fact his statement today is the first time I have seen him reference Q.”””
Yeah, this is more mark bradman aka sundance wishful thinking nonsense speculation with nothing backed by actual evidence.
8 posted on 4/9/2018, 10:55:15 AM by Okeydoker
Actually, if you do a little more reading you will discover an increasing number of Freepers commenting on CTH nonsense and the not too bright folks who are members of the sundunce cult. Where I may have been a solitary voice in the past, I am in the majority now.
12 posted on 4/9/2018, 11:50:33 AM by Okeydoker
Someone brought to my attention a fact I had heard several years ago, namely that he was a huge Hillary supporter before trumps election campaign. That is all you need to know. Anyone that goes from extreme hillary to trump is obviously not too intellectually stable.
24 posted on 4/9/2018, 1:20:05 PM by Okeydoker
All you need to really know about your hero Sundance is that he was a BIG Hillary supporter prior to the Trump Campaign.
34 posted on 4/9/2018, 2:34:44 PM by Okeydoker
Anyway, he’s got a great mind, excellent at organizing lots of information. He’s also famous for having a very bad temper, and is vindictive. He has NO sources of his own, because noboby trusts him, and he steals scoops, while trashing the original investigative reporters.
He’s the smartest guy in the room—just ask him.
He is often wrong, then hides it. Yes, he’s said Sarah is a deep state tool. And that Mueller is a white hat, as is Rosenstein. A year ago he said Comey lawyered up...etc.
His sycophant cheerleader commenters on his site are something to behold. “Oh Sundance, thank you!! We would be so lost without yuur brilliance!” Lol. Some no doubt are Mark Bradman himself. Yes, that is exactly something he would do.
40 posted on 4/9/2018, 3:27:45 PM by Okeydoker
Is unhinged Mark Bradman, who blogs under the fake name “Sundance,” a closet Marxist?
MARK LEVIN·SATURDAY, MARCH 25, 2017
The disgruntled former grocery clerk is lashing out with his usual leftist, class-warfare, conspiracy propaganda in defense of the big-government, Obamacare-lite, RINOCARE bill defeated by principled constitutional conservatives. The more we learn about Bradman and his “Conservative Treehouse” site, the more you wonder what this kook is up to.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/25/healthcare-controls-and-the-benefits-of-the-blame-game/
43 posted on 4/9/2018, 3:33:24 PM by Okeydoker
I would not call someone a great analyst if they are consistently wrong.
47 posted on 4/9/2018, 3:38:36 PM by Okeydoker
I dont feel the need to prove my case. Mr bradmans history of overreach, inaccurate and plainly wrong analysis of documents, wishful thinking predictions and overall lack of credibility speak for themselves. One area I will credit him for putting an an analysis together that makes it easy for others to understand is his description of the uniparty, economics ties to the uniparty and the role of the US Chamber of commerce in bribing congress for anti american purposes. THAT explanation is helpful without needing to rely on suppositions, speculation and fantasy.
49 posted on 4/9/2018, 3:43:38 PM by Okeydoker
I dont have the time to list every daily BIG UGLY that he predicts that never comes about, especially since he never comments on his predictions that are wrong and disppear into the ether ( sounds just like the comments I sent you from another sundance critic). Are we the only people who actually read and listen to this guy and then know when stuff he says doesnt come to pass? I guess other CTH folks merely repeat his musings and never bother to follow up.
51 posted on 4/9/2018, 3:54:13 PM by Okeydoker
Their is NO organized anti cult activity. It is just that many folks recognize what you apparently refuse to do.
54 posted on 4/9/2018, 4:00:27 PM by Okeydoker
Really? Ive seen a few comments comparing Q to CTH in a satirical way and a few posters criticize crazy bradman.I would hardly call it aggressive or organized or an epidemic of criticism.
59 posted on 4/9/2018, 4:07:41 PM by Okeydoker
Oh, well. You seemed more astute and discriminating. Critical thinkers are certainly not located at CTH. Read the CTH comments. Tell me if you find them embarrassing.
65 posted on 4/9/2018, 4:44:39 PM by Okeydoker
Please rest assurred i have no intention of smearing anyone. And I suspect the same is true for the many others who find bradman less than credible. I must confess that your reaction seems a little too personal and animated to be dispassionate. Are you somehow connected to CTH in any way? Your reactions seem way excessive for the simple claim that somebody was a hillary supporter.
67 posted on 4/9/2018, 5:06:24 PM by Okeydoker
Sundance! Your champion! The center piece of your troll today. LOL. FAIL. Go back to the troll dock until your handlers reload you. You’ve malfunctioned. Try harder.