Since Trump was perfectly willing and able to fire Tillerson, and move Pompeo to his spot, and the Haskel (sp?) gal to the CIA, if Sessions was useless, why couldn’t he have just fired him and replaced him a long time ago? He would not need to wait and wait and use some special means to “get rid” of Sessions. He could just fire him.
Take a look at the derp reaction to his firing and their squealing about his replacement recusing himself. And the move.on.org 'red line' rhetoric for the answer to that, LJ.
Tillerson and the others were not part of the derp FIREWALL.
A recused Sessions protected them, allowing BLACK HAT derp [RR] to run the derp operation. That's why they are trying SO HARD to keep [RR] in charge by having Whitaker be recused. Stealth bomber is their worst nightmare. [RR] out of the loop means release of the derp dirt and PAIN.
It's all very simple, LJ.
It's one thing to defend Session, but we must see the true nature of the game.
As long as Q backed Sessions, I was down with it. Now I think he's saying that there were reasons not to trust him any longer.
Bagster
He would not need to wait and wait and use some special means to get rid of Sessions. He could just fire him.
~~~~~~
Whitaker does serve a notable change, RR is no longer in charge of Mueller...Boom
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
LJ, you are right, as usual.
I see Bags' appeal to symmetry with Scaramucci, but SERIOUSLY ... Scaramucci as STEALTH BOMBER???!
He was about as stealthy as a parade of inebriated Elvis impersonators on motorcycles.