Posted on 10/30/2018 10:33:15 PM PDT by Simon Foxx
Oh boy are you sick. . . you are not qualified to diagnose anyone, asshat. . . much less accurately describe someone's symptoms you PROJECT on to anyone from your own psychiatric problems. It's obvious you have again doubled down on the ad hominem attacks by implying anyone opposing you has psychiatric or psychological symptoms, which is itself a deliberate ad hominem attack. . . hoping to denigrate your opponents in the eyes of other readers. Such an attack is the last refuge of those without cogent arguments. . . that, Mac_truck, is certainly YOU.
YOU know nothing about the topic at all. . . so you throw anything you can think of against the wall from something YOU read that others have created out of whole cloth, and when you get shot down by knowledgable people you attack their psychological foundations to bolster your own short-comings (among other things that are no doubt short as well).
You want to talk about delusional thinking this is delusional:
Now its entirely possible that the rights to animate Q-anon were actually sold or otherwise formally bestowed on Pamphlet and his crew, with Alex Jones acting as the broker.
It is rife with ad hominem attack on at least Alex Jones. . . with absolutely no evidence or rational reasoning behind It except your irrational claims that SOMEONE other than Q was posting as Q when Q moved to 8Chan—again asserted by YOU without proof— which gets us back to your begging the question circular arguments, that pesky logical fallacy. YOU blither a lot but you provide ZERO evidence. . . none. The only thing you've linked to is a completely debunked video from "Microchip," a fraud who has been proved to be a know nothing who did not stand up to scrutiny when he first appeared and challenged by knowledgable programmers.
Did you just make that up or did you pull that out of your nethermost orifice where you most frequently find your head?
We do know that Pamphlet and Baruch did a taped segment with Jones and then went to dinner with the Info Wars crew in late 2017... both of which were unusual occurances to bestow on a couple of relatively unknown Chan mods.
So someone claimed but, like Microchip, has NEVER PROVED IT, least of all you. . and when challenged have been very short on facts. . . or knowledge or provided other evidence that would prove it. They have also made statements that Q would not continue, but then make the excuse that one of more of them is not in agreement to stop, a transparent circumlocution to avoid the fact that any one of them COULD post as Q and out all of them but they simply have not. None of them have showed the kind of knowledge Q has posted to give them any credit for what they claim.
You come into threads and drop claims like the above royal "we know" statements ex cathedra with no authority and certainly no provenance, and expect people to take your word for their factual basis. Nope, not going to happen.
Why is that "funny?" Is if funny to say that someone who has studied a subject is more knowledgable than someone who has not?
Q started posting on October 27, 2017. It is now November 1, 2018. People have been investigating the meaning of those posts for over a year. DennisW claimed he had not even invested five minutes looking at it but had decided it was garbage. We who have been studying what Q has posted have followed what clues Q posted and found that there is real meat there. . . not garbage. Each one has lead to more information. Yes, there is some, as Q stated, dis-information. But most others lead to eye-opening interconnected data. These Q denigrators really do not know how much IS interconnected because they haven't been paying attention to what is found, just to what Q posted, not to the fruits of what that Q post lead to.
“Questioning the academic credentials of a writer who is writing about politics is the last refuge of a scondrel.”
So according to Jack Black we should believe ALL writers of politics, because they are on the internet, but Q, not so much.
(haaahaaaahaaaahaaaaahaaaaa)
Microchip's claims have been thoroughly debunked. His claims of "programing" expertise where completely shot down as he kept dancing, changing his story on Reddit, making excuses for his basic errors about even SIMPLE programing mistakes. He doesn't know what he was talking about. He first claimed he did everything, his programing, etc. from an iOS platform, and posted his proofs of changes in videos showing an iPhone screen where the TIME STAMP NEVER CHANGED! It was always set at the time from of Apple's default time they use on their sample screens. It was shown he was animating his supposed modifications to the Q posts on a fixed screen shot, not actually changing them. IT WAS BOGUS.
Now, since he was caught doing that, he's posted the videos from a desktop screen. Still BOGUS. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. Lie to me once, you lie to me about everything. That was and is Microchip.
Many people have monetized their analyses of Q by asking for donations through PayPal or Patrion. So FREAKING WHAT? Q specifically told followers to not patronize such pay or monetizing sites.
Diaz's analysis has been both on and off in what the analysis said. If Diaz wanted more subscribers, it could have been far more accurate in analyzing what Q was saying. It was not. It was about average as analysis sites went. Ergo, Diaz did not have an insider's knowledge of Q. That Diaz was in bankruptcy prior to 2009, nine years ago, is irrelevant to any financial condition in 2017-1018. . . and is a meaningless red herring you've raise to obfuscate the issue.
Obviously you are quoting your blockquote from some other source, but you don't bother to provide that original source. . . But it matters not. It seems whoever it is doesn't care for entrepreneurship at all. You DO realize that FR has Freepathons to keep the lights on, and the bandwidth JR needs to support all of us happy don't you? These people at these sites you are denigrating have a different model than Netathons to do the same thing. . . YOU DON'T LIKE IT, I get that. . . but it is there business model to keep the doors open. I repeat: SO FREAKING WHAT?! None of that is proof they created or are mainting Q's posts. . . if they were, they'd be prescient about what Q posts. They are not. They are just average in their conclusions and analysis. Ergo, they have no insider knowledge.
“What the Q people really want is a Free Republic where they alone can expound on Q and there is no forum for skeptics and debunkers to even have a say.
And you guys almost got that! Amazing.
And then call us “anti-free speech”. Ha ha ha.”
Gee, I almost forgot to comment on this part.
Oh yeah, we guys ‘almost got this’ as you NPC shreikers pounded the site until Q followers and supporters got banned to ONE SINGLE THREAD while you anti-Qs get to troll all over with as many anti-Q threads as you wish apparently with the owners blessing so tell me again who got what they wanted.
That post I will title, "The Wreck of the Mac Truck".
"The legend lives on from the Qanon on down
To the forum they call Free Republic...."
Q just got back in town, today.
#QanonLives
The Huber mass indictment hoax is proof that Q is garbage. Yes there was a conspiracy against Trump and you can read Dan Bongino and Gregg Jarret on this.
When Dan Bongino never mentions Q ever! then I know for sure the Q phenomena is garbage. I have listened to Bongino podcasts for 6 months and he wrote a book. Amazon w 600 plus reviews.
You sir live in a deluded world. Bongino and Rush won’t mention Qanon because they want to keep their mass appeal. Doen’t make it not true as much as you think it is garbage.
You sir live in a deluded world. Bongino and Rush won’t mention Qanon because they want to keep their mass appeal. Doen’t make it not true as much as you think it is garbage.
#################
Hannity has mentioned Q publicly. He talked about Q contracting him regarding some info Hannity needed and didn’t have. It’s on YouTube. Sorry I can’t be more specific, it’s been a few weeks and I’ve listened to too much since then.
Sure wish I’d found this thread sooner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.