That's great.
As far as I know, there is no 'red pill' movement. Red pill is a thing WITHIN the movement. You can call it THE GREAT AWAKENING I suppose. Or the Qanon movement. I mean, how do things really get to be officially called a MOVEMENT? Is WALKAWAY a movement? #MeToo? Antifa? Black Lives Matter? ISIS? The Tea Party?
Or are those things slogans within a broader movement.
I think a movement is a mass change within a society. And I truly feel that Q/TheGreatAwakening, call it what you will, is an incredibly strong and positive movement, capable of bringing great change. And isn't that what makes a movement?
I think so.
I also think Rush has a bit of Corsi syndrome as do some others I might mention.
You see, Rush wants to be the recognized leader of a movement, just as Corsi did. They want to be the one that people turn to for answers and opinions. The smartest guy in the room.
You could smell that on Corsi every time you listened to him. I can smell it on FreeRepublic sometimes, in smaller doses. *cough*Jack Black*cough*.
It sounds childish to say, but those types resent a Q, who actually IS the source of information that they wish they could be, and that people look to for answers.
So I think that's why guys like Rush don't explore the Q phenomenon and talk about it, as helpful as it would be for their stated goal, patriotic Americanism.
It doesn't make any sense otherwise.
Though there is a chance that Rush, at least, IS dialed in with instructions not to talk about it for a very specific reason.
Those are my musings and then some on the subject of Rush Limbaugh and others, as it relates to the Qanon movement.
Bagster