Check out the graphic in Q post #2388.
In the green box in the left hand column, there's a long list of Intelligence agencies that it DOES apply to. On that list is the Defense Intelligence Agency and a lot of other Intelligence agencies, including the NSA.
I'm not sure where "military intelligence" falls into that list, or if it even does.
That's why I brought this up. I have to think there is a "filter" in place between these qualified agencies and Q. Or slse that would be bad? Hatch Act-wise?
What the court will look at, and the derps try to say, is the information comes from these agencies, no matter the filter. In effect, those qualifying government agencies are violating the Hatch Act. That will be the derp position.
BUT. Q says they have legal analysis that protects them. A strong enough one that they are continuing.
So I don't think we have to worry. And, I say again. Whose court? Our court.
Case closed.
Bailiff, remove these derps from the courtroom.
p.s. We knew the derps would make this move at the beginning of Q. It's the obvious play. I thought it would be more of a "national security" angle, and they might still try that next.
I also thought they'd wait until Q was publicly acknowledged and indisputable.
Wrong.
Bagster