Wallace also said there’s no evidence to support the claim the protesters at Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation were paid to be there.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No evidence except for the people who said they were paid.
The dishonest media is back to using the legal definition of evidence used by the Clintons during their regime. It requires that a document, statement,item etc be accepted by a judge into a court case. No court case, no “evidence” by this definition. It doesn’t matter if you are present and grab a piece of a perpetrator’s papers as they are hitting someone with them.
Wallace is right, there is no evidence protesters were being paid.
He refuses to accept it and refuses to investigate it.
Wallace is paid to use his “serious face” shtick to gaslight his audience, the majority of which find him and his ilk INSUFFERABLE.
I loath Wallace more than Juan Williams - let that sink in for a moment.
with photos\video to back it up ...
“No evidence except for the people who said they were paid.”
And photos of organizers handing out cash to people — people who later were dragged out of the Senate chambers.
Other than those things, there’s no evidence.