Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Dark side of the moon would be a nifty place for a telescope.


2 posted on 10/18/2018 3:03:58 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grimmy

There is no permanent dark side of the moon. There is a near side we can see and a far side we can’t, but any point gets two weeks of sun and two weeks of darkness.


4 posted on 10/18/2018 3:06:11 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Leave the job, leave the clearance. It should be the same rule for the Swamp as for everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Grimmy

It really doesn’t have any advantage two weeks of sunlight for each side and out of radio contact with the Earth always, unless they have a geo lunar satellite deployed to relay coms.


14 posted on 10/18/2018 3:13:21 PM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (WWG1WGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Grimmy

Especially a radio telescope, with the moon blocking Earth sourced radio signals.


16 posted on 10/18/2018 3:14:01 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Grimmy
Dark side of the moon would be a nifty place for a telescope.

Radio telescope, sure.

Optical telescope? Sunlight, gravity, dust, and infrastructure needs makes a pure space-based system better.

28 posted on 10/18/2018 4:01:40 PM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson