To: tang-soo; reasonisfaith
Wow, tang-soo. Your gung fu is strong. It amazes me how you guys can go back and find certain posts on lost threads of the past.
That was a lot of work. I remember that night. It was fun. And reasonisfaith turned out to be a cool guy (and smart) after all that. But it was still fun and he didn't get too butt-hurt (I don't think).
The legend of 188. Hahahaha.
Wouldn't that be a trip of the Q people really did read our thread and post those exclamation marks just for little old us?
I find it hard to believe, but ya just never know in this strange new digital age we find ourselves in.
Bagster
689 posted on
10/17/2018 2:07:31 PM PDT by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
:) If I truly had that much gung-fu, I'd quickly create a meme with "Everyone was gung fu fighting! ditydity dit dit, dit, dit dit."
Also glad to hear about reconciliation with reasonisfaith.
709 posted on
10/17/2018 3:06:25 PM PDT by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: bagster
I thought that was a legitimate proof. Right after I started lurking moar it was one of the proofs that sucked me in, though nothing convinced me like the North Korea blow-by-blow.
741 posted on
10/17/2018 4:26:04 PM PDT by
ichabod1
(He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
To: bagster
Nice memories.
As for me being Q, I’m not. As I stated way back.
Here’s proof I’m not Q: It’s impossible to post in code with one hand while holding John Brennan and Phil Mudd in a headlock with the other. Not to mention Eric Holder. Shift key needed!
830 posted on
10/17/2018 8:24:03 PM PDT by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson