Replies

ok, I lied, but I didn't know I lied until now and I apologize.

I am looking at this now along your lines - with a jaundiced eye.

Assuming the report is what it says: From the report:

Request.
To analyze genetic data from an individual of European descent and determine if there is reliable evidence of Native American and/or African ancestry. The identity of the sample donor, Elizabeth Warren, was not known to the analyst during the time the work was performed.

Background. The individual’s DNA was previously sent to a DNA testing laboratory for genotyping, with a DNA microarray. The resulting DNA genotypes were sent to Dr. Bustamante for analysis. An expert in genetic ancestry analysis carried out the computational work described below under Dr. Bustamante’s supervision.

At what point did anybody know it was Warren's DNA ? Did Bustamante know ? Before or After ?

What brought me here was watching Warren's video that I start at the relevant part.

https://youtu.be/RHzbdZuVyAM?t=212"

contrived\staged - reminds me of Gephardt & Dashcle's dog & pony show phone call with Gore during the recount.

I really can't stand these people. Sorry and thanks again.

Cherokee Nation statement BURIED POCHANTAS.

“ A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person’s ancestors were indigenous to North or South America...
Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and it’s legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven.
Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage. “

Chuck Hoskins
Cherokee Nation Secretary of State

No worries whatsoever. It just seemed like we were arguing about terminology instead of the substance. I would be surprised to find out if the people hired were working blind, in part because I believe her story is 100 percent phony and she knows it, so she has to come up with a cover story that keeps her from being laughed out of the Democrat primary. That’s all this is about, a cover story. She’ll never do an actual test that everyone else will say is genuine. This is Crowd Strike with a different kind of data.