Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you. None of us benefit from being divided and at each other’s throats over this.

Even for those of us who believe there is something to ‘Q’, we must remember that it is imprudent to blindly believe any or all of it. Likewise, it is imprudent to expect that everything will come to pass exactly as *we* interpret ‘Q’ to suggest. (In fact, anyone who does believe ‘Q’ should know better than to foster divisions—it’s contrary to what ‘Q’ has been saying all along.)

In the same way, I invite the skeptical to at least be open to the possibility of there being some truth in it... even if you aren’t ready to be open to it yet.


17 posted on 10/10/2018 11:40:46 AM PDT by GCC Catholic (Trump doesn't suffer fools, but fools will suffer Trump. Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GCC Catholic

The “test of Q”, is can Q be falsified.

Since Q is anonymous, and it may have had multiple secret authors, friend and foe, therefore Q cannot be falsified.

Q cannot then be verified. Ever.
Accept it.


27 posted on 10/10/2018 11:52:12 AM PDT by TheNext (Anonymous Source)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson