Posted on 10/10/2018 11:22:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
You stated....”Smart people don’t like to lose arguments and they anger easily”....
How about the fact that generally most people, smart and not don’t ‘like’ to lose arguments and can get just as easily angered....because they can and do.
Well, look at this! You guys got your very own Q-bashing thread, and it appears that anything or anyone is fair game.
And some of us think Q is the best psy op ever! Shows what we know, huh?
You have reached the wrong conclusion, goodman.
Sounds like you're on the defensive ready for combat and intend to ‘win’ the conflict including the cost of discovering truth.
Does it? Or does it sound like I'm correcting your perceptions of reality? I never start conflict. Never. That's just science. I'm explaining to you that I respond when attacked.
You seem to be saying that defending oneself is a bad thing. Is it really? Don't you defend yourself? Aren't you defending yourself from boogie man Bagster and the evil Q demons right now?
You may be surprised to know that I much prefer reasoned discussion and debate, but the "environment" you mentioned earlier often doesn't lend itself to that type of discourse. Not when all around are ridiculing, insulting, mocking, and demeaning my way of thinking.
But I've had numerous discussions with skeptics that didn't result in ugliness. Maybe you just haven't seen them. What I'm telling you is that when provoked, I respond. Call that being defensive if you want. But it's not a bad thing.
After all you're after discovering truth are you not? Even in the face of insult?
Absolutely. The truth is the most important thing. And I am 188% sure that, given enough time and the proper "environment" I could and would convince most people of the truth as I understand it.
But there are so many that refuse to listen, which I have to say is pretty frustrating. But I'm learning to accept that as a reality. Can't teach old dogs new tricks sometimes.
How many hours, days and weeks was Kavenaugh questioned/ drilled 'without flinching'....as a good example of a man in control 'because' he knew he was right and confident in his positions.
See? Even on this we have different takes. Kavenaugh was excoriated by the derps for "flinching" during the hearing, in interviews, and writing an op-ed. And all he was doing was defending himself.
And they said that because he did, he didn't have the "temperament" to be a judge. Donald Trump is our hero because he defends himself like no other Republican ever has.
And that's a pretty good example of what's going on here. The "Q-pers" have the nerve to stand up and defend themselves and then their "temperament" is questioned. (Divisive, etc).
If I have to choose between defending myself like Kavanaugh and Trump or behaving like the Republicans of old, I choose the Trump/Kavanaugh option.
So, yea. Temperament. I guess mine sucks too.
But do you see my point, caww? Just like you misread the Kavanaugh situation, maybe you're misreading the Q/Bagster situation?
Is that possible?
I ask that with all due respect. And I ask anybody else reading this, as well.
Ya, I just said that.
You miss my point. I was explaining why a lot of people think I'm the devil.
Don't make me say it. I'd hate to have people think I'm arrogant.
#HumbleAndLovable
Bagster, do you believe the CIA operates it’s own naval fleet including an nuclear powered aircraft carrier?
I recognize a "kook trap" when I see one, goodman. :).
But I'll respond anyway with exactly what I think about that question.
First of all, I defy you to show me where Q has said or even insinuated that. But I do believe that its POSSIBLE that the derp state, of which the CIA has been and still is to a certain extent, is an enemy of America and has it's own assets.
What those assets are I have no idea. An aircraft carrier? I haven't heard that one.
Also, maybe we don't have a full understanding of what I believe the derp state is. It's not an organization with an office and signs.
It's a tenuous collection of people in powerful positions, place their intentionally in order to conrol an organization.
Think State Department, CIA, FBI, DOJ, Executive Branch, Judicial Branch, Legislative Branch, Media, Corporate CEOs, IRS, and even the military to a certain extent. Remember Obama purged any of the patriotic Generals he could identify and put those loyal to him in place.
That's how you take over a country, and we are now engaged in a shadow war against that takeover. And people are actually dying.
So is it possible that the CIA/Derp State controls it's own military assets? Of course it is.
That's my short (or not so short haha) answer to your question.
Did I avoid the "kook trap"? Gimme more.
#TheBarIsOpen
Wasn’t a kook trap, it was an honest question. The only place on FR where the alleged CIA fleet is mentioned is on Q threads.
thanks.
I know. I was on the horns of a dilemma about pinging them all.
I did note that I would never again post that report.
Let me add this thought.
The Derp State has and does also control foreign governments. An example was (no longer) Saudi Arabia.
And some foreign governments DO have aircraft carriers.
Think DiFiChiSpy.
you wound me deeply.
If you follow the threads (and I suspect you do, to some degree) you will know that ALL KINDS of theories are discussed. From simple to way out there. But it's not fair to cherry-pick the "kooky" ones and hold them up as an example of the entire research project.
All theories are vetted and either accepted, disagreed upon, or laughed out of the room, as some definitely should be.
But what's wrong with speculation and discussion? So much that we thought wasn't possible has already been proven to be true. Some truths are impossible to hide after a certain point.
And you have no idea of the effort that's put in by some to discourage "kook" talk. We know what will be done with it. So some thoughts are "off the table", even though it would be interesting to discuss them.
Anyway, it's a tenuous line to walk, between kookville and searching for truth. Wouldn't you say?
Especially when the derps are trying SO HARD to stop the signal and put us back to sleep.
CIA aircraft carrier? CIA Fleet?
Got any sauce for that?
A submarine has been mentioned, but I’ve not seen much consensus on any specifics about whos.
I seem to recall from the 530 some page redacted FISA abuse report the CIA is implicated in some not properly authorized Signals intel (ab)use.
No it doesn’t
And we're divisive?
C'mon, man.
You, uhhhh, still believe that Drudge is a legitimate conservative news outlet, right?
“Q” is so passe’, I’m now a follower of his predecessor, “Elemental P”......
wait, Drudge is NOT “the letter after P” ?
Collective name: Drudgers?
If we are Q-pers, then
Drudgers?
“Funny, I’m an old time Freeper and I have no idea what Q is.”
It comes after P and before R. Jeez, you’re dumb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.