[ez]

It depends on what he did. It depends on what he knows. It depends on what he offered. I depends on what he can testify to. It depends on trumps need. Lots of other factors besides the smile on his face.

[philman_36]

It depends on what he did.
What he did was allow the continuance of the illegal surveillance of a fellow citizen.
What he did was fail to perform due diligence in the performance of his duties by looking into the warrant application. Even if he is a white hat he pencil whipped it and that is wrong as well.

And no offense, but everything you said after that statement is drek, IMO.

[bagster]

It depends on what he did. It depends on what he knows. It depends on what he offered. I depends on what he can testify to. It depends on trumps need. Lots of other factors besides the smile on his face.

And this is what Q refers to as "Expand(ing) your thinking" and "Think(ing) logically".

Bully for you, ez.

We need more of that up in here, you ask me.

It can lead to better analysis and understanding, less impatience and demanding, and fewer stress-outs, arguments, and flame-outs.

Aaaaaaaaand less Wal-Mart.

Hahahaha.

Bagster

[buffaloguy]

There was a reference in a Q drop to RR with the phrase “ paid in full” or something like it which led me to believe that RR had done the operations which PDJT had asked him to do and at that point was considered a white hat. An important one.

It may be that his trip with Trump was the start of his rehabilitation in the public eye. Just my .02.