Replies

I want to respect LS’s wish not to ping him on Q ... and will start to do that right after this post.

I just need to point out that Q made the 53-47 prediction when votes were still in flux.

In the business world we come to understand that if you never make any mistakes, then you are not making any decisions.

Even with insider knowledge, Q does not possess a crystal ball.

As LS is well aware, someone (Feinstein?) got to Murkowski, and Heitkamp’s poll numbers tanked so she decided to maximize her money after leaving office. (And Daines would have voted if needed.)

Personally, I would love to know if any significant contributions were made to Heitkamp’s campaign in the last couple of weeks.

Because she is GOING TO LOSE ... and will GET TO KEEP THAT MONEY. (Like McCabe’s wife).

I respect LS and all the good he brings to FR and I just want to mention this before he goes. I believe what you posted as well. The 53-47 was the committed votes they had before all the shenanigans. The Q team even posted later they had lost some votes due to what the deep state players pulled out.

I wondered why the Q team would put those numbers out there prior to the final vote but perhaps it was to further panic the deep state. That was about the time we got the crazy over-the-top gang rape story.

I wouldn’t rule out they put those numbers out to further the panic on the DS side of things, so they would overplay their hand. As it turns out, they did. We have to keep in mind, they have hinted over and over again, this whole Q thing is a military operation to help win our nation back. Not everything they put out is going to be for our benefit. JMHO

CGato

My friend Zen Master, king of all things on the Courts, predicted 53 several months ago. So that’s nothing.

Second, the error I was referring to was the timing. Again, since I don’t follow Q carefully, I can’t cite it now, but he had the timing off.

Just not going to waste hours deciphering Nostradamus-type stuff.