Found this on the Chans. This takes it in another direction completely.
MUELLER] designed to take-in evidence needed to expose DS [DOJ block re: Mueller evidence ongoing investigation].
[MUELLER] designed to limit POTUS ability to maneuver.
[MUELLER] designed to stall-for-time until MIDTERM ELECTIONS to TERMINATE all HOUSE / SENATE ongoing investigations.
[MUELLER] designed to safeguard D_PARTY_BASE false narrative re: RUSSIA COLLUSION [POTUS CHEATED EVIL SKY FALLING] in effort to DIVIDE and MOBILIZE for future protests, riots, threats, violence, FFs, etc.
[MUELLER] designed to provide FAKE NEWS w/ ammunition to sway public opinion, obstruct foreign + domestic agenda, fuel impeachment/removal, fuel anti-POTUS [DIVISION] [prevent UNITY], etc..
[MUELLER] designed to demonstrate to foreign players that OLD GUARD still pulls strings.
[MUELLER] designed to mobilize D_PARTY for MIDTERM VOTE WIN.
[MUELLER] designed to push D_PARTY backers to DONATE [GOFUNDME D_PARTY].
[MUELLER] designed as PUBLIC OUTCRY EXCUSE should criminal charges be brought against them [we are being politically attacked because MUELLER
].
How do you REMOVE installed BLOCKADE?
DECLASDECLASDECLAS
How do you navigate around installed corrupt [FBI]
KEY WORD HERE IS DESIGNED
MUELLER IS OUR GUY!!
THAT MUS MEAN RR IS OUR GUY???
its all clicking, almonds activated!
Also someone took the name Bob (as in Mueller) and did something called Reverse full reduction on it and came up with 17. I dont get it, but its cetwinly intriguing, especially considering that Q told us we would be suprised when we learn who was talking to us.
Its a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
Very Interesting! I had noted the “designed” wording and had just told the hubs it almost sounds like Mueller is supposed to be delaying things. If this turns out to be the case the amount of MSM and liberal heads exploding will be massive.
And frankly if this is the case I think my own head will explode also! It would certainly be a Snape like ending to a movie.
interesting postulaltes in post # 1088
what is your take, LS?