Posted on 10/05/2018 8:40:23 PM PDT by EdnaMode
After more than a year of fighting FX and Ryan Murphy over her depiction in Feud, Olivia de Havilland has kept her word and is taking her case to the Supreme Court.
We must persevere and speak truth to power, the 102-year-old two-time Oscar winner said Friday as her attorneys petitioned SCOTUS in the ongoing legal battle. The fight is itself important to the principle of honesty, so much in need today in the face of deliberate public confusion for selfish agendas, she added in a statement from her Paris home (read it in full here).
Having suffered a number of legal setbacks and defeats since filing her lawsuit in June 2017, including the California Supreme Courts decision in July not to review her case de Havilland is seeking to have the nations highest court re-examine what jurisdictions in the Golden State have decided. The Court of Appeals decision is a radical departure from traditional First Amendment precedent, and benefits no group other than those who seek to use the names and identities of others in untrue and salacious historical dramas for their own profit, said , said the actress attorney Suzelle Smith of Horwarth & Smith in Los Angeles.
Are reckless or knowing false statements about a living public figure, published in docudrama format, entitled to absolute First Amendment protection from claims based on the victims statutory and common law causes of action for defamation and right of publicity, so as to justify dismissal at the pleading stage? asks the petition filed today (read it here).
FX and producer Fox 21 TV did not respond to Deadlines request for comment.
The Gone with the Wind actress asserts that FX, Murphy and Fox 21 TV never obtained nor even sought her permission to depict her or use her name in Feud: Bette & Joan, their eight-episode series about Joan Crawford and Bette Davis that aired last year. Among other issues, de Havillands lawsuit specifically targets the alleged backstage drama involving her depicted in Feuds And the Winner Is
episode about the 1963 Oscars.
My guess is that Ginzburg was put on the four drug chemo therapy combination that was recently recognized as effective when pancreatic cancer is caught early enough for surgery, which hers was.
Supreme Court Denies Review of Olivia de Havilland’s ‘Feud’ Lawsuit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.