Not persuaded. Many ways to read that “what did No name say?” May have been that No name provided ‘expert’ advice to ‘the flake’ because of his vast years of experience in the senate. May have been No name’s experiences with grass roots campaigns or those who owed No name a political favor.
I’m not saying the shoe was literally on the other foot. Heck, I don’t know if there was any blackmail card one way or the other.
Not trying to persuade you or anyone else.
Just stating it like I see it.
Imo, it couldn’t be more obvious. It’s samey same as someone engraving it on a clue bat and smashing me in the face with it.