actually, some thought he was protecting the Clintons in the Vince Foster arkincide.
Interesting read here:
http://www.fbicover-up.com/justice-brett-kavanaugh.html
Well, now, that subject would have made for some interesting questioning, wouldn’t it?
Definitely worth a read.
Kavanaugh seems to have been hip-deep in the Vince Foster coverup, and carried on this role in the Starr “Investigation.”
I remember being dumbfounded that Starr chose to ignore Clinton’s DOZENS of true crimes (including probably collusion with Chinese espionage) and go after the intern-sex scandal, perversely leaving the perv/rapist and the witch more popular than ever.
Starr was a COVER UP artist, much like what he attempted more recently as President of Baylor University, ignoring and covering up a true rape culture (not the “Me-too” BS) in the successful football program.
What I DID NOT REALIZE back in the ‘90s “investigation” was the specific measures and destruction of the truth in which Starr/Kavanaugh actively covered up the Foster murder. (I just noticed the radio silence on all Clinton’s true crimes, both of a personal and treasonous nature.)
It is frustrating to have to support Kavanaugh (another Yalie); however, I understand he may be the best POTUS can get confirmed in the present Senate ... and also that nominating Kavanaugh was probably an incentive to get Kennedy to retire.
This Foster-Clinton sleaze coming out again is a symptom of the overall sickness or our political environment, I guess.