Heh. Indeed.
Posted on 09/28/2018 9:22:21 PM PDT by budj
President Trump said he would defer to the committee who then said they wanted the investigation for 1 week and regarding the 2 complaints of Ford and Rameriz. Trump said okay and ordered it.
I am thinking this is what the democrats wanted all along. I am wondering if fake evidence could come up. My husband thinks I am cray but this is what I am thinking.
People here, I’m not sure if it is this thread or the other, say they aren’t going to talk to the FBI, that’s crazy if that is so. Maybe they don’t like the 7 day limit.
“The goal is not quality but quantity. The goal is DELAY.”
No, that’s just a small part of it. The goal is the destruction of the traditional United States of America - the government, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, not to mention it’s civility, heritage, history, and it’s future.
They have introduced utter lawlessness into the process. No one seems to know how to stop this crap. Or to be willing to.
They want to reduce the USA as we have known it to rubble. And rule like third-world thugs. That’s what the goal is.
“They” meaning the Blasey Ford side.
Fake evidence come up from whom? I'm not calling you crazy, but I'm not following what you're saying.
Flake was probably their backup plan all along, considering also his setup comments during the hearing.
IMO she is nuttier than squirrel poop, with the functional brain matter of 6 yr old.
Drugs, accident, who knows what caused her condition, but I doubt she could last a month if forced to batch for herself.
Without her ‘handlers’ she couldn’t order lunch.
No, it is not just a small part of it. It is EVERYTHING right now.
What you said:
The goal is the destruction of the traditional United States of America - the government, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, not to mention it’s civility, heritage, history, and it’s future.
can only happen if they have a majority in the Supreme Court. That is the fight, right now. We can stop that, right now.
Nothing small about it.
As I understand it, the investigation goes only to the charge at hand, Ford’s, not the Ramirez or any other allegations. And, I would think the investigation is a supplement to Judge Kavanaugh’s pre-existing investigations, it’s not an investigation of Dr. Ford, tho I suppose they could look into her reputation for honesty and credibility.
WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BET SHE HAD A WIRELESS MINI-SPEAKER IN HER EAR DIRECTING HER AS TO WHAT TO SAY OR HOW TO ANSWER QUESTIONS?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They scrubbed her clean before she became public knowledge. They probably had help from Silicon Valley.
Heh. Indeed.
They we’re most likely scrubbed from the internet.
By adding more information to the original stories they have told when they speak with the FBI more names, or specific dates and or specific locations.
Ford says she has repressed memories and Rameriz says her memory is fuzzy could they say more memories are coming to their minds. In other words can they change the story and make it more damaging by using a repressed or fuzzy memory?
Some good analysis of the involuntary (and in her case — planned and rehearsed facial and body movements and tones).
Democrat lawyers.
Here is one explanation for changing her web page.
He's obstructing justice! In 3...2...1
Iguess it depends on the state, but the article posted says that in Calif it’s against the law to for academics to identify as psychologists unless they are licensed (and I would imagine especially against the law for state employees to claim falsely). But everything about her is fake so it’s probably not surprising to many.
I’ll bt the two ladies that accosted him are linked to someone on his or Feinstein’s staff.
It’s all about theater and cover for voting against someone with sterling qualifications.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.