Posted on 09/28/2018 12:33:24 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
Report: City Permits Show Project Ford Claimed Was In 2008, Not 2012 City permit records appear to show Ford lied about "connection" to Kavanaugh.
SIGN UP FOR CONSERVATIVE DAILY POST NEWS ALERTS
Email address Sign Up Christine Blasey Ford testified on Thursday before the Senate Judiciary Committee that her “memories” of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh “first came up” in 2012. According to The Gateway Pundit and New York Post columnist Paul Sperry, it looks Ford may have lied about the exact date these “memories” resurfaced. If true, that would mean Ford committed perjury, which is a felony.
On Thursday, both Ford and Kavanaugh testified before the Committee. Ford alleges Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her around 1982 at a high school party. Kavanaugh not only denies the allegations, several of the witnesses who supposedly attended the gathering have submitted sworn statements to Congress that they never witnessed what Ford has alleged.
But one of the most notable exchanges came when Committee Ranking Democrat Diane Feinstein asked Ford about when she first told anyone about the allegations against Kavanaugh.
Ford provided a written statement and testified — both serve as sworn testimony, and carry a penalty of a felony — that her memories of Kavanaugh “first came up” when she began going to counseling in 2012.
In May 2012, Ford alleges that she and her husband began arguing because she wanted to add a second front door to their home.
She testified on Thursday that she wanted to add the second front door because what she alleges Kavanaugh did to her made her feel “claustrophobic.”
Soon after her testimony, Sperry sent out several tweets arguing that the Palo Alto building permits were issued to Ford in 2008, not 2012.
In the area, homeowners are required to have a city permit to make changes to their homes that aren’t within codes and guidelines. So, in order to get her second font door, Ford needed a permit from the city.
Sperry tweeted that Palo Alto building permit records “raise questions” about Ford’s testimony and her claim that her home underwent an “extensive remodel” in 2012.
If Sperry’s assertions are true, it would appear that Ford lied in her written statement and testimony to the Committee. Lying to Congress is a felony, and could result in Ford spending time in jail if it is determined she lied.
This explosive admissions matters because it would speak to her overall credibility. Aside from many of her flimsy allegations, having no witnesses, and the fact that she admits she isn’t even certain about many things regarding the assault, the date of her claim is equally as important.
Many would argue she appears to have lied about when she officially told others about the allegations against Kavanaugh. But it is just one of many unverified, unsubstantiated claims.
What else could Ford have lied about?
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ LIVE: Ford claims she's not "political" & that reason Kavanaugh first "came up in counseling" in May 2012 was that she & her husband argued over her desire to add "a second front door" to home b/c Kavanaugh had made her "claustrophobic." But there may have been something else ...
11:32 AM - Sep 27, 2018
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Palo Alto bldg permit records raise questions about Ford's testimony she completed an “extensive remodel” of home in 2012 & that this was seminal event that led her down path to coming out against Kavanaugh b/c she needed to add an escape door. Permit was issued in 2008
11:02 PM - Sep 27, 2018
*YAWN*
Hills of beans and prices of rice in Mongolia.
What’s more of a scandal to me is having to get a permit to put in a door. Do you need a permit to move a shrub too? I hope I never ever move to a place like this.
some angles are better left alone
“Do you need a permit to move a shrub too?”
In Palo Alto, the answer is yes
You can murder your baby inside the mommy but God help you if you cut down a tree
No it doesn’t. It means her whole testimony was unreliable.
Remember the lecture from Blumenthal about one lie poisoning all of the testimony? She’s got problems across the board: said she couldn’t show up on time cuz skeered of flying — debunked because she’s been in Delaware for about the last month. Just one of a bunch of Little Girl Lies Ms. Moneybags Ford told. The poor little me, all alone in the world act? She’s worth > $5M on the basis of her homes (note plural) in the world’s most expensive suburbs: Palo Alto and Santa Cruz.
The woman is a friggin’ fraud and an accomplished liar who learned how to play on everyone’s emotions when she was banging half the school in high school and later when she was in Psychology.
Wasn’t it the Dem senator that made a point about a single false statement should negate any other true statements? Is it time for him to eat what he cooked?
I read the door in question was for her rental house on the property?
That was Vietnam hero Blumenthal.
Yup. And that property is about 1.5 mi from Google.
Probably charges > $5K / Month in rent. That’s what houses in that part of PA go for right now.
Or more.
Maybe her and hubby don’t even live together and she has the second house. I found it weird her husband was not behind her at the hearings.
2008 or 2012. Dates? Ford don’t need no stinkin’ dates!
So, she “rents” to Google interns rather than “entertains” them. More words the college professor doesn’t know the meaning of.
Two front doors on a rental usually means at least a duplex rather than a single family home. Does the city know this?
She wants a separate entrance for AirBNB tenants. Not unusual at all to do something like this.
maybe they don’t report all the rents??
Maybe so, but if that was the case, then she lied about why she wanted a 2nd front door!
Prosecute her!
need I say;
pictures plez
There are pictures of her two homes that have been oublished in the Daily Mail.
That site takes a very long time to load on my device.
But if you interested, the pictures are out there.
Not sure if you can see the extra door or not.
When I lived in Palo Alto, it was very far left, but not absurdly so.
My father and I tore out and replaced whatever shrub or tree we chose.
I miss the non-tract houses. I miss the tree-lined avenues. I do not miss those like Mark Zuckerberg.
(Though I had the grades and scores, I did not even apply at Stanford. I grew up mere blocks from it, and did not want to turn out like those radical students I met.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.