Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

African-American Senators Introduce Anti-Lynching Bill
https://www.npr.org ^ | VANESSA ROMO June 29, 20189:05 PM ET

Posted on 09/28/2018 7:02:35 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

Congress's three African-American senators introduced a bipartisan bill Friday to make lynching a federal crime.

Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Tim Scott, R-S.C., drafted the bipartisan legislation, which defines the crime as "the willful act of murder by a collection of people assembled with the intention of committing an act of violence upon any person." It also classifies lynching as a hate crime that would warrant enhanced sentences.

"It's a travesty that despite repeated attempts to do so, Congress still hasn't put anti-lynching legislation on the books," Booker said in a statement. "This bill will right historical wrongs by acknowledging our country's stained past and codifying into law our commitment to abolishing this shameful practice."

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2018 notes that during the first half of the 20th century nearly 200 attempts to pass anti-lynching legislation failed to gain support from the Senate despite urging from seven sitting presidents.

It also cites statistics supported by research compiled by Tuskegee University, that more than 4,700 people were lynched between the years 1882 and 1968. About three-quarters of the victims were African-American. And according to the bill, "99 percent of all perpetrators of lynching escaped from punishment by state or local officials."

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Education; History; Reference
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
PDF

https://www.harris.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/ALB18773.pdf

1 posted on 09/28/2018 7:02:35 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Clarence Thomas will be glad to hear this.


2 posted on 09/28/2018 7:04:13 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

This is apparently a desperate attempt at self-preservation. They know what they’re trajectory that we are on, there are bound to be lynchings of democrat politicians at some point. And, given yesterday, perhaps there should be.


3 posted on 09/28/2018 7:04:42 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Forgive me, but it seems like they might as well pass bipartisan legislation banning jaywalking in terms of being so obvious.


4 posted on 09/28/2018 7:04:53 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

These f’ng idiots NEVER stop.

Bull****.


5 posted on 09/28/2018 7:07:16 AM PDT by ZULU (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Too many taxes

Too many laws


6 posted on 09/28/2018 7:07:40 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Would it apply to kavanaugh?


7 posted on 09/28/2018 7:09:13 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

“the willful act of murder by a collection of people assembled with the intention of committing an act of violence upon any person.”

So basically murder?

.....um, ok. Well glad to get that squared away, I guess.


8 posted on 09/28/2018 7:10:22 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

This is just pre-election grandstanding. Murdering someone is already illegal. Now we’re down to methods. What about beheading, bludgeoning, poisoning? They’re all pretty awful ways to go.


9 posted on 09/28/2018 7:11:04 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

This is an overreach by the Federal Government. A clear violation of the 10th Amendment.


10 posted on 09/28/2018 7:11:27 AM PDT by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

And how many people have been lynched SINCE 1968? Since 1978? 1988? 1998? 2008? 2018?

I’ll bet, outside of the poor Bird fellow who was drugged by a chain around his neck by a couple of vile murderers in Texas, there hasn’t been any.

Will they say Trayvvon or Big Mike Brown were lynched?


11 posted on 09/28/2018 7:12:27 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Vote GOP this November. Take two friends to vote with you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Why didn’t Hillary introduce this bill when she was a Senator?


12 posted on 09/28/2018 7:13:47 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

So wait... lynching people is LEGAL?


13 posted on 09/28/2018 7:14:10 AM PDT by dangus ("The floor of Hell is paved with the skulls of bishops" -- St. Athanasius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Bravo.


14 posted on 09/28/2018 7:16:23 AM PDT by RevelationDavid (Jesus First, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Murder is murder and has always been illegal. Method is not relevant.

Hate is a motive, not a crime in and of itself. Laws criminalizing thought is a slippery slope. Will someone ever be able to cobble together several indications of someone’s mind and convicted them of hate thought without an overt act? Designation of “hate crime” is simply a way to take away our free speech. I like Senator Scott, but the hate crime aspect of this is unacceptable and a threat to our God-given rights.


15 posted on 09/28/2018 7:17:44 AM PDT by RatRipper (The Democrat Party is the party of liars, swindlers, cheats and unbridled immorality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Will they ban the political party that invented and supported lynching?


16 posted on 09/28/2018 7:18:20 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

I thought Reginald Denny’s treatment in the LA riots was an attempted lynching (he was the white truck driver who was nearly killed for being white).

Marginalized irrelevant people fill their days with inconsequential nonsense while productive people keep the trains running on time - and work to feed, clothe, and house the marginalized irrelevant people.


17 posted on 09/28/2018 7:20:09 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Now, who can be against lynching?

Lynching does not have to result in murder. Clarence Thomas was victim of a high tech lynching.

Shouldn’t this bill be expanded to include people concealing their identities in order to perpetrate mob action against lawful citizens. Doesn’t Antifa engage in lynching?


18 posted on 09/28/2018 7:21:32 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ("The MSM is the enemy of the American people"...Democrat Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Attention seeking through the legislative process. Unless a state line is crossed in the process, what is the federal jurisdiction? There’s already civil rights legislation.

The statistics on lynching are really interesting. About 25% of the victims of lynching were white. Compare that to violent crime statistics. It doesn’t make it right, it’s doesn’t mean the lynched people guilty, but it does take it out of the realm of “bad whitey takes pleasure in murdering black children and nothing else.”


19 posted on 09/28/2018 7:25:11 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

What took you so long?


20 posted on 09/28/2018 7:26:52 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Have an A-1 day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson