Posted on 09/27/2018 4:02:14 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer
The Despicable Press has been distorting the original intent of the First Amendment for many, many years
I can’t pretend to have knowledge in this field, but it seems to me that FR would not require such excerpting if the IBD site did not demand it.
“it seems to me that FR would not require such excerpting if the IBD site did not demand it...”
I presume that’s the case. If you don’t like it, don’t go it. There are a number of true blog posts on FR every day that don’t require their articles be excerpted, but are excerpted anyway. They’re the ones who deserve the bulk of the criticism, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.