Here’s this, can’t verify:
Re: Kavanaugh Hearings a National Disgrace
Can you tell us where you got that info, Enigma3, or provide any links?
If true, especially that Ford is CIA, it certainly puts a very different slant on the situation.
I don’t understand how it is that the 3rd party allegedly in the room at the time, whose last name is Judge, has not been required to testify.
Of course the fact that he and Kavanaugh were friends could very well affect his testimony, but at least there would be the opportunity to form an opinion about whether he is a reliable source or not.
I didn’t have a feeling one way or another about Ford’s testimony, but having been a rape victim myself, I can certainly say without reservation that if she truly was a victim, the last thing she would want to be doing was testifying before the whole world about her experience, unless she felt a moral obligation.
On the other hand, if she is CIA, all bets are off.
I thought Kavanaugh’s behavior did not recommend him as a potential Supreme Court judge.
Portraying himself as a victim is unwise and only creates more of a victim mindset, and the amount of evasiveness and sheer whining on his part was embarrassing, imho.
Clarence Thomas was a disgrace as a Supreme Court Judge, and with Kavanaugh’s past record of voting against women’s rights and the environment, I think he will not be better.
Quote Posted by enigma3 (here)
The back story to this is quite interesting.
1. A parent of Kavanaugh’s (a judge) ruled against a parent of Ford’s in a court hearing many moons ago.
2. An internet blogger stated that Christine Ford is currently (amongst other things) an undergrad CIA recruiter at Stanford.
3. That which was scrubbed from Ford’s yearbooks indicates that she and her cohorts were hard partiers in high school and got very drunk on occasion.
4. Both Ford’s parents are/were CIA assets.
5. The goodie #1. The CIA under Gina Haspel noted a big upsurge in traffic between two of its secret bases. Supposedly she/CIA captured all the chatter and determined that a rogue element within the CIA (still haven’t cleaned it out yet) is behind the Kavanaugh attacks. She then confided this information to Trump and Grassley. Shortly thereafter Grassley called for a vote to send the nomination to the full Senate.
6. Goodie #2. Q has stated that the Dems tried to bargain the Kavanaugh seat by trading a yes on Kavanaugh for not releasing the unredacted FISA pages. That was summarily rejected by Trump et all.
One of the major problems I have with this is that the Dems have had some of this information and sat on it for at least 3 months. That doesn’t exactly smell like above board ethics. It just plain smells.
As has been stated elsewhere, the accusers have brought NO corroboration for any of these charges. In fact, the 4 people Ford brought up have all issued statements that the events as described by Ford did not happen. Ford did state that one person witnessed the party. She is a close friend, so rather biased.
Finally, the woman prosecutor who questioned Ford later told the 51 Republicans in the Senate that she would never bring the case to trial for - wait for the boom - lack of evidence. Not even enough evidence to ask for a search warrant!
I like this one!
~~~
5. The goodie #1. The CIA under Gina Haspel noted a big upsurge in traffic between two of its secret bases. Supposedly she/CIA captured all the chatter and determined that a rogue element within the CIA (still haven’t cleaned it out yet) is behind the Kavanaugh attacks. She then confided this information to Trump and Grassley. Shortly thereafter Grassley called for a vote to send the nomination to the full Senate.