Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ScottinVA

No as that would be seen as a threat.....But He should do that regardless of the outcome in the vote. I would gladly support him.


25 posted on 09/26/2018 10:59:00 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: caww

The intent of the hearing is to confirm Judge K’s character. The lying mudia (yes its redundant, and spelled correctly), commiecrats (redundant with “mudia”), et al will drag this out till Judgement Day (when they’re finally STIFLED FOREVER - Halleluja!!!)

The TRUE evidence of Judge K’s character is found in his public service record which I understand to be stellar.

Compare Judge K’s honorable record with all those legitimately taken down via “Meeee Twoooo.” The truly guilty could not hide once the cover was removed by their media accomplices.

How could any conservative judge with even the slightest evidence of any type of bad behavior survive a week on the job? When it’s a conservative under scrutiny, the prerstitutes do their job - until the need for FAKE NEWS arises.


28 posted on 09/26/2018 11:52:59 AM PDT by caprock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson