Nonsense.
You set up a straw man fallacy and you knock it down.
Your comment is false. Myself, I've been describing Trump playing the long game.
Most here trust that Trump has a plan. What we don't agree with is that Sessions is part of that plan. He is NOT. He is recused.
I like to attack Sessions as much as anyone else for what I can see. But what if it turns out that sessions is and has been part of the long game all along. Would you consider Q more credible at that point? I’ll bet not.