What was added later? The date? That made no difference because Judge Moore denies ever knowing the woman. Now if Judge Moore says he knew the woman but wrote in her yearbook years later when she was an adult, then the added date would be a bone of contention.
“What was added later? The date? That made no difference”
You make no sense.
You acknowledge she doctored it by adding writing.
Yet earlier say it was all the same ink.
Did she borrow Moore’s pen from decades before?
I’ve seen that type of distortion countless times in faxes, scans, and copies. Thats not a different font, just a distorted copy.
The subject matter is still completely fabricated even if the letter itself is an authentic representation of the original.