Of course it’s a plot. The Democrats always are in the gutter and resort to anything to push their agenda of high taxes, big government, and killing babies in the womb.
The fact that there is a political conspiracy in place against constitutional, limited, government - and against judges such as Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh who stand for it - hales back much further back in time than the “vast right wing conspiracy . . . against my husband” claim made by Hillary Clinton twenty years ago. That has been undeniable for so long that it hales back almost to the time referred to in Mrs. Ford’s complaint against Judge Kavenaugh.
Even by Ms. Ford's own telling, in the putative incident:
And the truth of the charges alleged by Ms. Ford against Judge Kavenaugh cannot actually matter.
- the prestige of the US government was not compromised by the brutalizing and murder of a US ambassador.
- nobody was killed.
- nobody spent a night in terror and fighting for their lives without support from their U.S. government employer.
- the incident putatively happened back around 1982. No less than a third of the people who were alive in America in 1982 have died since then. 9/11/01 happened since then. And the US fought two wars in Iraq and one in Afghanistan. In that perspective, is Ms. Ford’s angst actually the only thing that matters?
So the question for Senator Feinstein, is
- It will never be clear that the charges are true - and it will never be clear that they are false. The charge is too indefinite and witness-free. It asks Judge Kavenaugh to prove a negative. If the facts can’t be known, what would it mean to suggest that the facts are important - or that they matter at all?
“What difference, at this point, does it make?"
Gotta hand it to the Democrats here. They'll fight for what they believe in, dirty if they have to.