Posted on 09/20/2018 8:25:45 PM PDT by ransomnote
Dunno ... it’s hard to tell what’s known or planned ahead of time. The DEMs bringing out Ramirez reaks of desperation; I think they’re winging it. But it is predictable.
I think Grassley has more than we know ... he could have closed the door on Ford and faced some wrath from DEMs but probably made it through because public opinion thought 3 out of 4 that she was lying. But Grassley kept playing & biting ... the inadvertent disclosure she may have just taken a cross country plane trip is incredible and I’m confident Grassley + other’s background teams are all over this. This movie is ACTION PACKED! ;)
creepy lawyer update
Q post #2249
Sep 21 2018 10:34:50 (EST)
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/21/newt-gingrich-texas-offers-blueprint-for-red-wave-election-in-november.html
“You may not have read about this GOP victory, because the liberal national media is not exactly excited to report that Republicans reclaimed a seat they had not held in 139 years.”
“
this victory is even more frightening because the district is 73 percent African-American and Hispanic.”
Read carefully - significant!
RED WAVE
Q
I still can’t get over this special election we won for first time in 139 years is a border town and the district is 73 percent African-American and Hispanic. Their predictable playbook ain’t working anymore.
I’m interested in more details about the font. We need to know what the history of the document is - was this an e-mail? One of the posters on that thread is convinced - whatever source - it was printed and scanned (or something) and that accounts for the skewing; possible but the font size looks different to me. If it’s an e-mail then it’s binary and has HTML source + headers and meta data. Is it a word document attached to an e-mail, thus without headers i.e. from/to/subject? Well there’s metadata with that, too (i.e. history of edits to HRC exhonoration letter. The history of events is also important - was this the same letter as sent to the congresswoman and then redone for Feinswein? Then we’d love to see the other, too. Clearly the date is current.
I’m presuming the source of this document was an e-mail (direct contents) or attached doc & that’s why there’s no signature.
Modern e-mails contain multiple parts; typically one with HTML (just like formatted on these pages) and an accompanying with stripped text (for display on non-HTML e-mail clients). Anybody that’s cut & copied + pasted text in & around an e-mail knows how such a font change could arise. It might also have been intentional i.e. highlighting her charge - in which case it would be interesting to compare against other(s).
Senate Judiciary Committee Republican staffers should have fun with this one :)
after her politics became operative, she claims it’s now to set politics aside...bee-u-ti-ful
so...who has bigger stones...DiFi or Grassley ?
Put bug-eyed Schiff-for-brains bug-eyed pic in with those 2.
I don’t think it’s stones - DiChi has those lol - but it’s what cards are you holding - DiChi has a pair of 2’s. Grassley is not showing his cards. My guess is he’s got at least three of a kind; maybe a flush or straight or even full house. This is desperation politics from the bottom of their gutter ... “Q” calls it PANIC in DC ;)
With all these cries for FBI to get involved ... I’m left wondering if this was a setup providing the good guys an opportunity to take a peek behind the curtain here. There is nothing to follow-up on Judge K side - they’ve already done that 6 TIMES. Rather, I’d love to see the history of docs & communications etc. in this setup.
Or think it will help you retain entitled power...
Now would be a good time to accelerate the retirement of Democrat Senators (and Congressmen, too). The Republican retiree count got well ahead of the Democrat count. It’s time to even the balance — and then some.
If, as I and others suspect, Feinstein and the derps doctored that letter and inserted Kavanaugh's name into it from a previous Gorsuch letter.
All things are possible in Derp World.
Greatly agree.
Isn’t it fascinating how conservatives only assault liberals and especially members of extreme leftist organizations?
ping
IIRC, someone has. But I don’t know what to suggest to find it.
I thought the points were quite true with great import.
Well & accurately put, imho. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.