But the global warming group would never ever 'adjust' data?
1 posted on
09/20/2018 7:15:00 PM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
To: DUMBGRUNT
He should be a climate researcher. They love altered data, laughable math, ridiculous computer models, all capped by the complete inability to predict anything.
And actors, politicians, and others to whom STEM curricula was anathema will love them.
2 posted on
09/20/2018 7:18:32 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: DUMBGRUNT
How about retracting this?
.
4 posted on
09/20/2018 7:23:13 PM PDT by
Fungi
To: DUMBGRUNT
A cadre of skeptical researchers and journalists, including BuzzFeeds Stephanie Lee, have taken a close look at Wansinks food psychology research unit, the Food and Brand Lab at Cornell University, and have shown that unsavory data manipulation ran rampant there. Diet Deniers!!!! Stone them!
According to the Cornell provost, Wansinks academic misconduct included the misreporting of research data, problematic statistical techniques, failure to properly document and preserve research results, and inappropriate authorship.
Michael "Hockey Stick" Mann, someone has stolen your research methods.
5 posted on
09/20/2018 7:24:06 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Leave the job, leave the clearance. It should be the same rule for the Swamp as for everyone else.)
To: DUMBGRUNT
Easy.
The university and he wanted government grants.
Government wanted his research to confirm or reject whatever things they wanted it to say.
He conducted his studies to give the government the results their grants paid for.
6 posted on
09/20/2018 7:30:18 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: DUMBGRUNT
15 posted on
09/20/2018 8:01:11 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: DUMBGRUNT
I dont want to say how, but I know Dr. Wansink and I can say everyone here would find him a charming and sincere man. He is the sort of person who will be totally honest with you when you ask a question and you can see how he lights up from just having the opportunity to be with you.
However, I can see how he could choose to ignore data that might not seem supportive or relevant, but then, I can see how this would be an easy choice for so many researchers. Unfortunately, marketing personalities are not often rigorous personalities. Rigor talent goes to computer science, statistics, finance, accounting, medical, and engineering disciplines.
18 posted on
09/20/2018 8:46:47 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: DUMBGRUNT
“JAMA said Cornell couldnt provide assurances regarding the scientific validity of the 6 studies because they didnt have access to Wansinks original data.”
“Professor” Michael Mann has put the same sort of restrictions on access to his original data.
21 posted on
09/20/2018 10:29:51 PM PDT by
Reverend Wright
(I am a Putin bot. And I approve this message.)
To: DUMBGRUNT
Food, climate, second hand smoke, all the same bs results from the same bs methods.
Our lives have are being run by fraudsters in and out of government.
Is everything false?
27 posted on
09/21/2018 1:54:09 AM PDT by
metesky
(My investment program is holding steady @ $0.05 cents a can.)
To: DUMBGRUNT
Huh.
I read the article and came away with the feelz that it’s more of an attack by the usual SJWs (buzzfeed, etc) and that the studies under attack are rather common sense supported.
Now I’m wondering what it was he said that offended a blue-haired ring-nose and started the attack.
36 posted on
09/21/2018 11:09:53 AM PDT by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson