I'm not a Q supporter but if his/her stories are true i wouldn't call it conspiracy either trying to turn something into conspiracy when its factual is tantamount to mental instability
I seen the pics no one claimed the paying of protesters was staged not then and not even in this article they try to hint you into believing it most subtly so say who the conspiratist here Q or the Washington post ?
Coming from one of the biggest fake news dispensers in the country. Bwahahahaha
Don’t believe your lying eyes, believe us instead........
They say the perps of Q have already confessed that it was all a big hoax. So how come Q is still putting out their posts?
So here is a WaPo article about Q, not in the Q homeland thread. What are you going to do about this?
The WP has to prime their readers so they can explain the DoJ files as nothing but feeding conspiracy theories.
“Trump Russian collusion” is probably the most deleterious conspiracy theory of the decade, and it had its genesis in government.
All Q stuff is ONLY to be posted to the bi-weekly Q threads and NOT anywhere else.
I might believe their story but the paywall stopped me, LOL
BTW- This link was included in Q’s first post today(Tuesday). But I still have not clicked on it. I won’t click on a Washington Post link. Not even for Q.
1) “Hate speech” is relegated to “internet’s darkest corners”
2) Everything conservatives say is labeled “hate speech”
3) Conservatives can only “assemble” and “speak” at “internet’s darkest corners”
4) Every conservative statement (including conspiracy theories) comes from “internet’s darkest corners”
5) FB/google/twitter/DNC win that battle