Great edition of your publication. I’ve got a looooong list of session bashers that I’m holding on to for the moment.
I’d like to see defiant speak about Sessions now, he spent a week or more doing his long posts about how worthless Sessions is.
Boy, it really is true what they say about women never forgetting anything they are mad at you about. That was about 6 months ago.
What I said was no one would be happier than me to find out that Sessions was playing a role the entire time. It seemed to me that there were better ways to attack the deep state than let it run rampant for 2 years, destroy people like Manafort and have Mueller tie up the administration. I resolved to stay out of that argument and just wait and see. As time went on, as more and more things fell into place, I moved into the Trust Sessions camp. There was still no evidence that Sessions should be trusted, but there was so much proof that Q was indeed working with the President, and if you trust the President, then you have to trust what Q was saying. Simple as that. Session being recused was part of a plan.
It looks like the unrecusal of Sessions, which I argued he should do back then, is in fact about to happen. On the brink of that, and another big Q proof, you choose to dredge up an old, long-dead argument? Vindictive much?
“I’ve got a looooong list of session bashers that I’m holding on to for the moment.”
I am so glad someone made a list. I’ve been so sick of the Sessions bashing. I watched him the day he said he wasn’t going to broadcast what he was doing about investigations and of course it made perfect sense to me. Why would you tell the criminal element your moves?