Hopefully this will be roundly and soberly ignored while the process of confirmation continues.
Next up; a replacement for Skeletor.
And E) there’s not a shred of evidence.
And F) She’s a registered Democrat. In California.
Anita Hill has re-surfaced.
Her word against his.
And E) there’s not a shred of evidence.
And F) She’s a registered Democrat. In California.
————————
And the notes from her 2012 psychiatrist session doesn’t name Kavanaugh
And the guy, judge, that she says was there strongly denies it - https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/09/dems-below-bottom-of-barrel.php
They aren’t even trying to be clever, just retooling the Clarence Thomas smear campaign and hoping it sticks this time.
Who just spent the last three days wiping out all her social media accounts.
It’s the seriousness of the charge.
The bigger the Lie, the better.
Alinsky 101.
How much do democrats care about women? Eshoo and Feinstein held on to the letter for 4 months. If the so-called incident was so horrendous, why wasn’t it immediately handed to the FBI? Implied is the fact that, if Kavanaugh had not been confirmed, they would have let the matter die, denying this woman her justice (assuming she told the truth, which is Anita Hill doubtful). Her “derailment” was no more than a political insurance policy. That’s your democrat party.
I am so sick of these women coming out 20 to 30 years later with unproveable charges. I had a few girlfriends in ny youth that outright lied about sex. One was dumped by a guy so she called his workplace with bizarre stories. She slashed his tires and egged his car. Besides, laying on tlp of somebody is no big deal. She was probably drunk as a skunk. Or ... it may not even have happened.
No pubic hair on a Coke can, no semen-stained dress and not even the usual sexual harassment allegation.
For someone allegedly raped by a 17-year old boy, she didn’t fare too badly.
Now she comes forward after all these decades. How convenient.
This woman sounds like the kook from the Rollingstone piece that got them sued.
Any one of us can make up a lie.
Interesting point: In the cults (my opinion) around various gurus they always have one or more women to attack them legally. An article “I’m In Love With My Guru” in a magazine detailed several of them.
Similar to Play Misty For Me (Clint Eastwood film about an obsessed female fan of a disc jockey who tried to murder him and his girlfriend).
In the Life of Yogananda by Philip Goldberg which I read recently, they said two independently done DNA tests years later to show the guru was innocent of paternity. He died in 1954 but scandal was still purported in a case later.
In the 1920s-1940s women swooned over various swamis and their husbands were enraged and asked police to arrest the swamis out of jealousy.
The Woodstock benediction guru Swami Satchindanda was accused of asking for sex, which as a celibate he strongly denied. Several other gurus had women who said they loved them and the swamis had sex with them. Denied and fought in court battles. Latest ones had DNA to save them from paternity cases. Some women see them and delude themselves that the guru is talking only to them and loves them.
I think Kavanaugh is now a rock star judge and so is attracting liars and book deal and book tour Omarosa types.
When young do we think women said to him at a party “Associate Appellate District Judge Intern? Step into my bedroom , dream guy?” More like, “That’s interesting. Sorry but I want to see if the green jello is being set up. See you sometime later.”
Ford is a DNC and Bernie donor.
The other person she says was in the room denies any attack ever took place.
She sounds like a real C u Next Tuesday
Hopefully this will be roundly and soberly ignored while the process of confirmation continues.
Next up; a replacement for Skeletor.