[Wayne07]

Given her account to her therapist, it seems like something happened. Should drunken behavior at party 35 years when you are 17 be relevant? No! Absent an actual rape or murder, it is just not relevant.

However, reflexively calling her a liar is just more fodder for the Dems to paint republicans as anti-woman. Every republican candidate is going to get asked whether they support Kavanaugh, and if they say yes, they next day the ad will be "Candidate X doesn't believe woman who have been sexually assaulted."

[Thumper1960]

A liar is a liar.

Being a squishy spine Republican is, sadly, par for the course.

News Flash for ya: women can and do lie, ya know.

[snarkytart]

Duke Lacrosse? Rollingstone frat boy rape story?

The only reason BOTH of those were found out is because the accusers didn’t wait 20 years where everything could be disproved.

For you to make the comment you just made lets me know you’re a troll.
After all the stunts and lies the left along with the media pulls your concern is Republicans looking anti woman?

Yea okay.

[Mears]

“However, reflexively calling her a liar is just more fodder for the Dems to paint republicans as anti-woman”

---

The are nor “reflexively” calling her a liar-——they are calling her a liar.

,