First thing that jumps out at me is the person who administered the polygraph is a former FBI agent rather than a polygraph examiner. I think they can be both but it is also possible that they were an agent and not a polygraph examiner with the bureau and they are trying to puff up credentials.
Second, it states that the results were presented for the general statement she made about the supposed incident versus questions about the details. If the FBI was administering the polygraph, I am certain they would ask her specifically about each of the details in her statement. It does not appear that is what happened here.
yeah let’s see the lie detector questions. the statement is worthless without.
does Kavanaugh want a chance to knock this all down like Clarence Thomas did?