No problem on this end with “reading comprehension.” However, there is most certainly a problem with sincerity on your end.
The entirety of your post was directed against “shills” - and you made NO distinction between “shills” and those “people” (aka “individuals”) who either dismiss or otherwise question the authenticity and sincerity of the Qanon entity.
In fact, by the plain meaning and arrangement of the words you chose to use in those sentences of the disputed posting, you made the two terms - “shills” and “people” - interchangeable.
So don’t make attempts to back pedal, and don’t insult my intelligence with your “reading comprehension” bullsh*t. Your intent was clear enough: Opposition to, or doubting the authenticity of “Q,” equates to being a peddler or user of child porn, child prostitution and human trafficking.
Well bless your heart, you seem to be getting your panties all in a twist for nothing, unless you think you fit my definition of a shill.
Normal people that don’t think there is anything to Q might make a doubtful comment on a thread now and then but it would take pages and pages and pages of derogatory Q posts and perhaps be a relative newbie to fit in the shill category don’t you think?
Check the first video out on this twitter page.
https://twitter.com/realTRUMPERLAND
Who couldn’t like that Q drop video? I just love it don’t you?