Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

It is surprising that you are not understanding what that passage means. I am a lawyer, but it should be clear even to a non-lawyer.


795 posted on 09/15/2018 6:35:20 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant
It is surprising that you are not understanding what that passage means. I am a lawyer, but it should be clear even to a non-lawyer.

I understand that legalese can be interpreted many different ways, if vague enough, and depends often times on the whim of "controlling legal authority" (judge).

This particular set of EO's and amendments to the military code of justice tell a story and signal intent. The only impediment to follow through is the Constitution (maybe) and it just may come down to the Supreme Court ruling. We already know how Kavanaugh will rule. He told us.

Let's make sure we get him confirmed, eh? And then get on to gettin' on.

Bagster the non-lawyer.

Bagster


809 posted on 09/15/2018 6:48:38 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 795 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson