[Basket_of_Deplorables]

I looked at it. Says nothing about the 6th ammendment. You know, the one that prevents prosecuting anyone (Huber) for a crime outside your jurisdiction, or modifying a jurisdiction to cover a previous crime. "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law..."

[haffast]

You have more than you know.

Too proud to study your lesson?

Your future: D5

Despite the facts, he proudly lagged behind to eat his Viennies and crackers........

"LEAVE HIM!!!"

"But...but, ....... WWG1WGA !??"

"Not that one. He wouldn't recognize the truth if it hit him in the 4%er!"

Tick Tock

#futureprovespast #icanwait #citizencolludeswforeignentitiesspecial

[BlueMondaySkipper]

Small thinking.

If someone used NSA data to commit a crime and that data was stored in Utah, then Utah could indeed be the venue. If someone used an NSA computer to commit a crime and that computer was located in Utah, then Utah could indeed be the venue. Think about it.

In addition, Huber can bring a case in any jurisdiction he wants, there is nothing keeping him from charging in the area of the crime.