Thank you for the polite reply.
So, there is a Supreme Court precedent that allowed a US citizen to be tried by a military tribunal rather than a civilian court.
Thank you for that confirmation.
I never said that there wasn't. Here is what I said:
Military tribunals are completely out of the purview of the DOJ and not part of their system. The judges are officers, the attorneys are JAG officers and the defendants are in the military or subpect to it, like enemy combatants. I am not aware of any way that the DOJ would make recommendations relating to tribunals. Huber would not be part of the military tribunal system.
Mine was in response to a question asking whether Huber could work with a military tribunal. You seem to have read things into it that were clearly not there.