[LibWhacker]

But you’ve not offered a reason why it’s wrong.

I haven't seen the video. Did you post a link, or do you want me to explain why a video I haven't seen is wrong?

Second, I think you just want to argue. You've planted your feet on a preposterous mountain and dared me to knock you off. Sorry, not my thing.

[DannyTN]

I’ll have to go home and look at my viewing history to find the video. Which I probably won’t do. The concept is simple and the video covers much more than this. I don’t want you to minor pieces of the video or the author. I want you to debunk the concept.

And I just sent you two physics forums where they are saying it’s all relative to the frame of reference.

[DannyTN]

I’ll have to go home and look at my viewing history to find the video. Which I probably won’t do. The concept is simple and the video covers much more than this. I don’t want you to minor pieces of the video or the author. I want you to debunk the concept.

And I just sent you two physics forums where they are saying it’s all relative to the frame of reference.