Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: generally
My only problem is that I suspect RMN was also DS.

Nixon was DS, but had his own agenda. His 49-state blow-out against McGovern would have given him a mandate to do whatever he thought was right. Watergate put an end to that, but I also just noticed something. Just two days after Nixon's second inauguration, the Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade by a 7-2 margin. SEVEN to TWO on a huge overreach that most of the country, especially Nixon's voters, did not support.

Was Roe V. Wade just a giant DS thumb in Nixon's eye?

2,005 posted on 09/13/2018 10:46:20 AM PDT by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- said by Voltaire, lived by elite Libs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1987 | View Replies ]


To: AZLiberty

If you read the history of Roe v Wade, the initial decision was going to be 5-4, and then CJ Burger and another justice joined the majority in order to provide input and to make a historic decision seem to have greater support. Burger was a terrible CJ, but the Senate was in Dem control in those days, and they wouldn’t allow conservatives on the court. Nixon tried to get one, he got shot down.


2,041 posted on 09/13/2018 11:43:07 AM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2005 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson