p.p.p.s. I forgot to address this most basic assertion of yours.
No. You're right. He didn't say, "TRUST SESSION" in post #2164. However, as I pointed out, he explained in GREAT DETAIL and rudimentary fashion (crayons) WHY we should TRUST SESSIONS.
I thought I had made that clear. Apologies, goodman.
In fact, I actually thought Q was addressing you directly and personally when I read that post, if you wanna know the truth.
#QanonMakesMyArgumentsForMe
Bagster
No, there is no "we should" trust Sessions in #2164. Here are the pertinent words from that post:
SESSIONS and FLYNN [targeted] for [immediate] removal/recusal? SESSIONS Senate CONF vote? [RR] Senate CONF vote? Reconcile. IF SESSIONS WASN'T A THREAT WHY WAS HE THE PRIMARY TARGET? WHY WAS IT CRITICAL TO MOVE [RR] INTO DOJ ACTING AG RE: APPOINTMENT OF MUELLER / DIR SC OVERSIGHT [AUTH]? IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR ENEMY IS PLANNING HOW DO YOU PREPARE STRATEGICALLY? THINK TODAY. LEFT SUPPORTING SESSIONS? LEFT DEFENDING SESSIONS? STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE?Q is merely reminding Anons that the Office of AG is a threat to the Dems/Left. Doesn't matter if Sessions is in the seat or Bugs Bunny, so long as it's not their guy, it's a huge threat to them.
So the AG was targeted immediately, first at the confirmation hearing, then for recusal. But RR sailed through because he is one of their guys. That's what Q is pointing out and Q goes further that because POTUS is dissatisfied with Session's performance, especially the recusal, and that dissatisfaction is genuine, that suddenly now the Dems/Left love the guy, they 'trust' the guy. And Q is pointing out that the Dems/Left are now using Sessions against POTUS by threatening a campaign issue if Sessions is fired, and certain GOP members of Congress have cautioned POTUS against firing Sessions. Hence, Sessions will be allowed to stay in place until after the Midterms.
Q hasn't said "TRUST SESSIONS" for a very long time. That correlates with POTUS's changing view of Sessions. POTUS doesn't dislike or 'hate' Sessions, POTUS merely wants a super competent AG in the seat and there are many to choose from, but POTUS's hands are tied, he is frustrated and he is said publicly that he is frustrated and he has said so sincerely.
Sessions is confined to matters outside the deep state coup plot because of his recusal. And the coup plot is huge, so Sessions took himself out of the most important DOJ focus of the Trump presidency. Sessions is confined to areas of border, drugs, child trafficking. But there are areas of intersection with the deep state coup. So Sessions prosecutes child trafficking ad comes full stop when it leads to the Clinton Foundation. This neuters Sessions.
I first noticed Sessions's deficiencies early on in the Bundy/Hammond cases. In those cases, the prosecutors violated law and practice by hiding exculpatory evidence that the defense uncovered. What did the newly confirmed Sessions do? Why he acted the proverbial good old boy get-along-to-go-along, "gee, I'm your AG and I'm here to let you know I support you", this to the corrupt Obama era prosecutors. Idiot. Same pattern with the recusal, "Gee. I wouldn't want to step on any toes now would I?". Idiot.
And what did POTUS do? He did what Trump always does, he plans how to get around difficulties. He has truly brilliant attorneys working for him in the WH and they all put in place a plan to take down the Swamp while bypassing Sessions and his 'recusal'.