Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: eldoradude

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/JW-v-DOJ-Clinton-Lynch-Tarmac-June-2018-Docs-02046.pdf

Haven’t seen some of these Strzok emails. And page 19 is curious. In July 2016 DOJ filed motion in Fed Court seeking 27 month delay in producing correspondence of HRC aides and officials and ........if allowed public can’t read until October 2018.

Why 27 months?


1,527 posted on 09/12/2018 1:29:40 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1498 | View Replies ]


To: Cats Pajamas
Haven’t seen some of these Strzok emails. And page 19 is curious. In July 2016 DOJ filed motion in Fed Court seeking 27 month delay in producing correspondence of HRC aides and officials and ........if allowed public can’t read until October 2018.

Why 27 months?

Because there are two prime numbers between 2 and 7, namely 3 and 5

2 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 17 = Q

1,798 posted on 09/12/2018 9:09:24 PM PDT by spokeshave2 (TrumpÂ’s building an underground railroad - a way off the plantation to freedom, jobs, and dignity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1527 | View Replies ]

To: Cats Pajamas
Haven’t seen some of these Strzok emails. And page 19 is curious. In July 2016 DOJ filed motion in Fed Court seeking 27 month delay in producing correspondence of HRC aides and officials and ........if allowed public can’t read until October 2018.

Why 27 months?

Statute of limitations expire on certain actions exposed in the correspondence?

Here's the article referenced in the email -

https://hotair.com/archives/2016/07/01/reporter-fbi-ordered-no-photos-no-pictures-no-cell-phones-during-clintonlynch-meeting/

This is interesting - not much discussion on Clinton himself being under investigation for the State Department-Clinton Foundation intersection for - “The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed,” one source said.

Finally, let’s stop focusing on the fact that this meeting was inappropriate because Clinton’s wife is under investigation by Lynch’s Justice Department. I mean, that’s bad, but it’s actually letting Lynch and Clinton off the hook a bit. By focusing on the appearance of conflict because Hillary Clinton is being investigated, we are willfully overlooking the very real conflict in the fact that Clinton himself is under investigation, as the Grand Poo-bah at the Clinton Foundation. (Fox News)

Shouldn't Lynch herself be under investigation for even agreeing to and attending the meeting?

1,813 posted on 09/12/2018 9:55:11 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1527 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson