“So your contention is that Huber and only Huber interviewing someone determines the validity and/or seriousness of the investigation?”
Well, since Huber is held up repeatedly by Q as being the determinant man in all of this, yes. Is it not more impressive when the top dog does a bit of the work himself? I am under the impression that Mueller does some interviewing himself.
Also, it is logical to assume that, since Huber is supposed to have hundreds of people working for him through the DOJ, that when Huber is mentioned, it refers to him or a lieutenant acting on his authority. No sentient person insists that executive heads never delegate authority.
“By that logic should Sessions and only Sessions do all interviews for the DOJ?”
“that logic” refers to an argument I never used. It is doubtful any Attorney General at the DOJ ever actually does investigative work himself, being the overall executive in charge.
You missed the Q post about this. Please catch up. Here is an excerpt from #2006 posted on 8/30 to help clear this up for you. Note the inclusion of “directly”
“Emotions cloud judgement.
Why is ‘Huber’ being discussed now?
What if the TX Congressman was not supposed to drop that name?
Why is ‘Huber’ being discussed now?
Why is ‘Huber’ (all of a sudden) being grouped into the ‘Anti-Sessions’ remove, fire, ….nothing being done?
Discussed by Right or Left?
Huber did not ‘directly’ interview….[insert name]?
Huber did not…….
Huber did not…….
Sessions did not…….
Sessions did not…….
When will Sessions…….
When will Sessions…….
Who does Huber work with specifically?
Who investigates?
Who prosecutes?
Team of 470?”
Huber has I believe 249 or was it 449 investigators at his disposal.