But somehow your opinion if digenova is proof. Pffft...
“But somehow your opinion if digenova is proof. Pffft..”
Proof of what?
Digenova’s wife is the lawyer, the very concerned lawyer, for the FBI witness, and she is the one who says Huber has not interviewed her client.
My favorable opinion of Digenova does not alter that fact, and that fact seems to point out that Huber is not even doing the obvious. Now, would you, yourself, not want to interview the FBI agent just out of curiosity?