And you think that means the (likely non-existent) indictments were all issued without the involvemnt of the US DOJ then? Apparently you do, and are now attempting to claim that Magoo is independently (yet still somehow secretly) working with all 50 induvidual state attorney generals, instead.
Well I guess that gets you your desperately needed separation from Sessions having to rely on his corrupt DOJ, but not sure how you believe the state attorney generals have jurisdiction to make federal charges against the swamp members, since state AG’s don’t indict for federal crimes, only state ones. Not sure you’re even aware of this jurisdiction limitation, but if you are, please explain how you expect state AG’s have criminally indicted federal officials with federal crimes. Thanks!
You might wanna google that one too. How did you make the leap from Sessions meeting with State AGs to State Ags filing Federal indictments?
Your desperation to look smart and support your failing argument smells worse than your ignorance. The combined aroma reeks of boiled cabbage, farts, and urine.
#YouKnowNothingJonSnow
Bagster
“That point is critical because as Sessions’ March 29 letter explains, the inspector general’s jurisdiction to conduct civil and criminal investigations includes “actions taken by former employees after they have left government service.” Then Huber can act on any of those matters.
As a U.S. attorney, Huber has full authority to empanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges. A grand jury can be empaneled anywhere, which means that it could be a group of citizens from deep-red Utah – in the heart of Trump country – instead of the D.C. Swamp that decides whether to hand down indictments for felony prosecution.”
Perhaps the best suggestion any of us could give you is to go to Sam’s Club and buy a pallet load of clues. I’m skeptical you understand your convoluted disjointed conjectures.